ISO 9001 Standard / ISO 9001 Standards – ISO 9000 Standard / ISO 9000 Standards Certification & Implementation

Develop Quality Management System Documentation In ISO 9000 Standards
Documentation is the most common area of non-conformance among organizations wishing to implement ISO 9000 quality management systems. As one company pointed out: “When we started our implementation, we found that documentation was inadequate. Even absent, in some areas. Take calibration. Obviously it’s necessary, and obviously we do it, but it wasn’t being documented. Another area was inspection and testing. We inspect and test practically every item that leaves here, but our documentation was inadequate”.
Documentation of the quality management system should include:
1. Documented statements of a quality policy and quality objectives,
2. A quality manual,
3. Documented procedures and records required by the standard ISO 9001:2008, and
4. Documents needed by the organization to ensure the effective planning, operation and control of its processes.

Quality documentation is generally prepared in the three levels indicated below that follows. Use ISO 10013:1995 for guidance in quality documentation.

Level A: Quality manual
States the scope of the quality management system, including exclusions and details of their justification; and describes the processes of the quality management system and their interaction. Generally gives an organization profile; presents the organizational relationships and responsibilities of persons whose work affects quality and outlines the main procedures. It may also describe organization’s quality policy and quality objectives.

Level B: Quality management system procedures
Describes the activities of individual departments, how quality is controlled in each department and the checks that are carried out.

Level C: Quality documents (forms, reports, work instructions, etc.)
1. Work instructions describe in detail how specific tasks are performed; include drawing standards, methods of tests, customer’s specifications, etc.
2. Presents forms to be used for recording observations, etc.

ISO 9001 Standards & ISO 14001 Standards Related Blogs are as follows:

http://iso14001-standard.blogspot.com/

http://environmental-management-system.blogspot.com/

http://iso9001systems.blogspot.com/

http://iso-9000softwares.blogspot.com/

http://iso14000-series.blogspot.com/

http://iso9001qualitysystem.blogspot.com/

http://iso-14000-ems.blogspot.com/

http://iso-9001standards.blogspot.com/

http://iso9000-standard.blogspot.com/

http://iso-9001-quality-manual.blogspot.com/

http://iso-14000-standards.blogspot.com/

http://iso-14001-standards.blogspot.com/

http://iso-9001-quality-system.blogspot.com/

http://iso-9001-standard.blogspot.com/

http://iso-environmental-management-systems.blogspot.com/

http://iso-9001-quality-management-system.blogspot.com/

http://iso9000qualitymanagementsystem.blogspot.com/

http://iso-9001-standard.blogspot.com/

http://iso-14001ems.blogspot.com/

http://iso-14001-quality-system.blogspot.com/

http://iso-14001-quality-manual.blogspot.com/

http://www.iso14000store.com/blog

http://www.iso9001-standard.us

ISO 9001:2008 Documentation Requirements

ISO 9001:2008 clause 4.1 General requirements requires an organization to “establish, document, implement, and maintain a quality management system and continually improve its effectiveness in accordance with the requirements of this International Standard”

Clause 4.2.1 General explains that the quality management system documentation shall include:

documented statements of a quality policy and quality objectives;

a quality manual documented procedures required by this International Standard documents needed by the organization to ensure the effective planning, operation and control of its processes, and records required by this International Standard;

The notes after Clause 4.2 make it clear that where the standard specifically requires a “documented procedure”, the procedure has to be established, documented, implemented and maintained. It also emphasizes that the extent of the QMS documentation may differ from one organization to another due to:

the size of organization and type of activities;

the complexity of processes and their interactions, and

the competence of personnel.

All the documents that form part of the QMS have to be controlled in accordance with clause 4.2.3 of ISO 9001:2008, or, for the particular case of records, according to clause 4.2.4.

Scope Of  The Quality Management System

The ISO 9001 standard requires the quality manual to include the scope of the quality management system including details of justification for any exclusion. The standard addresses activities that may not be relevant or applicable to an organization. The permissible exclusions are explained in section 1.2 of ISO 9001. Here it states that the organization may only exclude requirements that neither affect the organization’s ability, nor its responsibility to provide product that meets customer and applicable regulatory requirements. The requirements for which exclusion is permitted are limited to those in section 7 of the standard.

Under ISO 9001:2008, it was possible for organizations to exclude functions and processes of their organization that may have been difficult to control or were not part of the order fulfilment cycle. Organizations that designed their own products but not for specific customers could escape bringing these operations into the management system. Marketing was omitted because it operated before placement of order. Accounting, Administration, Maintenance, Publicity, Public Relations and After Sales Support functions were often omitted because there were no requirements in the standard that specifically dealt with such activities. As there is no function in an organization that does not directly or indirectly serve the satisfaction of interested parties, it is unlikely that any function or process will now be excluded from the quality management system.

It is sensible to describe the scope of the quality management system so as to ensure effective communication. The scope of the quality management system is one area that generates a lot of misunderstanding particularly when dealing with auditors, consultants and customers. When you claim you have a management system that meets ISO 9001 it could imply that you design, develop, install and service the products you supply, when in fact you may only be a distributor. Why you need to justify specific exclusions is uncertain because it is more practical to justify inclusions.

The scope of the quality management system is the scope of the organization. There is no longer any reason to exclude locations, activities, functions or processes for which there is no requirement in the standard. The reason is because the ISO 9000 family now serves customer satisfaction and is not limited to quality assurance as were the 1994 versions of ISO 9001, ISO 9002 and ISO 9003.

It is not appropriate to address exclusions by inserting pages in the manual corresponding to the sections of the standard and adding justification if not within the scope of the management system – such as ‘We don’t do this!’.

It is much more appropriate to use an appendix as indicated previously in the manual contents list. By describing the nature of the business, you are establishing boundary conditions. If in doing so you do not mention that you design products, it will be interpreted that design is not applicable.

For exclusions relative to detail requirements, the Compliance Matrix may suffice but for an unambiguous solution, it is preferable to produce an exposition that addresses each requirement of the standard.

Preparing ISO 9001 Quality Manual

The standard requires a quality manual to be established and maintained that includes the scope of the quality management system, the documented procedures or reference to them and a description of the sequence and interaction of processes included in the quality management system.

ISO 9001 defines a quality manual as a document specifying the quality management system of an organization. It is therefore not intended that the quality manual be a response to the requirements of ISO 9001. As the top-level document describing the management system it is a system description describing how the organization is managed.

Countless quality manuals produced to satisfy ISO 9001:2008, were no more than 20 sections that paraphrased the requirements of the standard. Such documentation adds no value. They are of no use to managers, staff or auditors. Often thought to be useful to customers, organizations would gain no more confidence from customers than would be obtained from their registration certificate.

A description of the management system is necessary as a means of showing how all the processes are interconnected and how they collectively deliver the business outputs. It has several uses as :

1. a means to communicate the vision, values, mission, policies and objectives of the organization

2. a means of showing how the system has been designed

3. a means of showing linkages between processes

4. a means of showing who does what an aid to training new people

5. a tool in the analysis of potential improvements

6. a means of demonstrating compliance with external standards and regulations

When formulating the policies, objectives and identifying the processes to achieve them, the manual provides a convenient vehicle for containing such information. If left as separate pieces of information, it may be more difficult to see the linkages.

The requirement provides the framework for the quality manual. Its content may therefore include the following:

1 Introduction

(a) Purpose (of the manual)

(b) Scope (of the manual)

(c) Applicability (of the manual)

(d) Definitions (of terms used in the manual)

2 Business overview

(a) Nature of the business/organization – its scope of activity, its products and services

(b) The organization’s interested parties (customers, employees, regulators, shareholders, suppliers, owners etc.)

(c) The context diagram showing the organization relative to its external environment

(d) Vision, values

(e) Mission

3 Organization

(a) Function descriptions

(b) Organization chart

(c) Locations with scope of activity

4 Business processes

(a) The system model showing the key business processes and how they are interconnected

(b) System performance indicators and method of measurement

(c) Business planning process description

(d) Resource management process description

(e) Marketing process description

(f) Product/service generation processes description

(g) Sales process description

(h) Order fulfilment process description

5 Function matrix (Relationship of functions to processes)

6 Location matrix (Relationship of locations to processes)

7 Requirement deployment matrices

(a) ISO 9001 compliance matrix

(b) ISO 14001 compliance matrix

(c) Regulation compliance matrices (FDA, Environment, Health, Safety, CAA etc.)

8 Approvals (List of current product, process and system approvals)

 The process descriptions can be contained in separate documents and should cover the topics identified previously (see Documents that ensure effective planning, operation and control of processes ).

 As the quality manual contains a description of the management system a more apt title would be a Management System Manual (MSM) or maybe a title reflecting its purpose might be Management System Description (MSD).

In addition a much smaller document could be produced that does respond to the requirements of ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and the regulations of regulatory authorities. Each document would be an exposition produced purely to map your management system onto these external requirements to demonstrate how your system meets these requirements. When a new requirement comes along, you can produce a new exposition rather than attempt to change your system to suit all parties. A model of such relationships is illustrated in Figure 4.10. The process descriptions that emerge from the Management System Manual describe the core business processes and are addressed in Chapter 4 under the heading of Documents that ensure effective operation and control of processes.

Continual Improvement In The Quality Management System

The ISO 9001 standard requires the organization to continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system in accordance with the requirements of ISO 9001 and to implement action necessary to achieve planned results and continual improvement of the identified processes.

ISO 9000 defines continual improvement as a recurring activity to increase the ability to fulfil requirements. As the organization’s objectives are its requirements, continually improving the effectiveness of the quality management system means continually increasing the ability of the organization to fulfil its objectives.

If the performance of a process parameter is currently meeting the standard that has been established, there are several improvement actions you can take:

Raise the standard e.g. if the norm for the sales ratio of orders won to all orders bid is 60%, an improvement programme could be developed for raising the standard to 75% or higher

Increase efficiency e.g. if the time to process an order is within limits, identify and eliminate wasted resources

Increase effectiveness e.g. if you bid against all customer requests, by only bidding for those you know you can win you improve your hit rate

You can call all these actions improvement actions because they clearly improve performance. However, we need to distinguish between being better at what we do now and doing new things. Some may argue that improving efficiency is being better at what we do now, and so it is – but if in order to improve efficiency we have to be innovative we are truly reaching new standards. Forty years ago, supervisors in industry would cut an eraser in half in the name of efficiency rather than hand out two erasers. Clearly this was a lack of trust disguised as efficiency improvement and it had quite the opposite effect. In fact they were not only increasing waste but also creating a hostile environment.

Each of the improvement actions is dealt with later in the book and the subject of continual improvement addressed again under Quality planning.

There are several steps to undertaking continual improvement:

1.  Determine current performance

2 Establish the need for change

3 Obtain commitment and define the improvement objectives

4 Organize diagnostic resources

5 Carry out research and analysis to discover the cause of current performance

6 Define and test solutions that will accomplish the improvement objectives

7 Product improvement plans which specify how and by whom the changes will be implemented

8 Identify and overcome any resistance to change

9 Implement the change

10 Put in place controls to hold new levels of performance and repeat step one

For more information, please visit http://www.iso9001-standard.us

The standard requires the management system documentation to include documented procedures required by ISO 9001 Standards.

ISO 9000 defines a procedure as a specified way to carry out an activity or a process. This definition is ambiguous because an activity is on a different scale than a process. Process outputs are dependent upon many factors of which activities are but one. An activity is the smallest unit of work. Several activities accomplish a task and several tasks reflect the stages in a process but there is more to a process than a series of tasks. This definition also esults in a belief that procedures are documented processes but this too is inaccurate. Procedures tell us how to proceed don‘t need to produce any others. The specific procedures required are:

(a) A documented procedure for document control

(b) A documented procedure for the control of records

(c) A documented procedure for conducting audits

(d) A documented procedure for nonconformity control

(e) A documented procedure for corrective action

(f) A documented procedure for preventive action

These areas all have something in common. They are what the authors of the early drafts of ISO 9000 :2008 referred to as system procedures ? they apply to the whole system and are not product, process or customer specific although it is not uncommon for customers to specify requirements that would impact these areas. Why procedures for these aspects are required and not for other aspects of the management system is unclear but it seems that the authors of ISO 9000 felt these were not processes ? a conclusion I find difficult to justify.

They are certainly not business processes but could be work processes. However, there is another message that this requirement conveys. It is that procedures are not required for each clause of the standard. Previously, countless organizations produced a manual of 20 procedures to match the 20 elements of ISO 9001. Some limited their procedures to the 26 procedures cited by the standard and others produced as many as were necessary to respond to the requirements.

Document control is a work process or a number of work processes because the inputs pass through a number of stages each adding value to result in the achievement of defined objectives. These are the acquisition, approval, publication, distribution, storage, maintenance, improvement, and disposal stages. These are not tasks but processes that achieve defined objectives and involve both physical, financial and human resources. Within these processes are tasks, each of which may require documented procedures as they are initiated.

Control of records is also a work process similar to document control. There are the preparation, storage, access, maintenance and disposal stages. This is not one uninterrupted flow but a life cycle. There is not one task but several performed at different times for different reasons.

Auditing is certainly a process with a defined objective. Without the provision of competent personnel and a suitable environment, audits will not achieve their objectives no matter how many times the procedure is implemented.

Nonconformity control like records control is a work process for the same reasons. The sequence of tasks is not in the form of an uninterrupted sequence. The sequence of stages may be identification, documentation, segregation, review, remedial action and disposal but this is not a continuous sequence. There are breaks and different procedures may apply at each stage depending on what it is that is nonconforming.

There is little merit in having one corrective action procedure when the source of problems that require corrective action is so varied. One Corrective Action Form might be appropriate but its application will be so varied that it is questionable whether one size fits all. Presenting top management with a nonconformity report because it has been detected that the organization charts are not promptly updated following a change, will not motivate them into action. Corrective action forms part of every process rather than being a separate process. It is unreasonable to force all actions aimed at preventing the recurrence of problems through one process. Many problems are prevented from recurring not by following a procedure, but by the designer, the producer, supplier, manager remembering they had a problem last time and doing it differently the next ? i.e. they learn from their mistakes. No forms filled in, no procedures followed ? just people using their initiative ? this is why corrective action is part of every process operation.

Preventive action remains one of the most misunderstood requirements of ISO 9001 because it is mistaken for corrective action but more on this. There is even less justification for one preventive action procedure because the source of potential problems is so varied. Preventive actions are taken in design, in planning, in training and in maintenance under the name of FMEA, Reliability Prediction, Quality Planning, Production Planning, Logistic Planning, Staff Development, Equipment Maintenance ? preventive actions are built into these processes and similar to corrective action are part of every process design.

ADVANTAGES ACHIEVED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF Quality Management System (QMS)

- An Romania Perspective

The assurance of quality of the delivered products and services has always represented the main goal of any organisation which wants to be on the market. The concept of „quality” is larger than in the past, referring also to management aspects. Thus, the quality of products and services does not represent only a goal, but a consequence of the quality of the whole managerial activities, workers, and even a quality of partnerships. Modern industrial reorganisations are usually realised through the strategies of quality management, due to the fact that these are able to release the continuous and substantial improvements of the economical agents’ performances.

Within such a frame, one possibility for an organisation to maintain and to gain new positions on a market is to design, to implement and to certificate a Quality Management System (QMS), system through which all processes are controlled.

The Romanian pharmaceutical market is currently restricted as volume and value compared to other countries in the region. Joining the European Union and future improvement of living conditions will mean increase of pharmaceutical expenses per person, considering the fact that the demand for pharmaceutical products (medication) is not influenced by the evolution of prices. After 1990, foreign manufacturers have become interested in the increasing potential of Romania, a country of 22 million inhabitants with a very low intake of drugs per person, due to the low living standard. They have penetrated the market through direct import companies, through license agreements, acquisitions and privatizations.

Romanian manufacturers have tried to shift their direction towards export, but the barrier represented by the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP – for production) and ISO 9001:2000 standards (for distribution) has stopped their penetration of new markets. Their exports mainly targeted Russia, Moldova and former socialist countries. Without norms of this kind, also known as standards, today’s international trade would be inconceivable because every product would have to be checked in keeping with individual criteria. Norms, therefore, create comparability.

Nowadays, the external market has, for several companies, the same importance as the domestic one. The conquest of external market is essential because it brings currency, improves commercial balance, creates new working places and promotes the managerial or technological know-how transfer.

ISO 9000 is a generic name given to a family of standards developed to provide a framework around which a quality management system can be effectively implemented. These standards were developed mainly to facilitate commercial relationships and to increase the confidence of consumers in the capability of a supplier to constantly satisfy the requirements of products and services quality.

The paper presents some advantages achieved by implementation of Quality Management System in pharmaceutical industry, namely S.C. X Company S.A from Tirgu-Mures, one of the most important producer and distributor of pharmaceutical products in Romania.

Using a proven management system combined with ongoing external validation, enables the X Company to continually renew its strategies, domestic and external operations and service level. To this respect, the paper presents the main steps in implementing the Quality Management System within this organisation and some benefits of the registration such as increasing domestic sales, but most off all, the penetration and increasing sales on external markets.

The ISO 9000 family of standards represents an international consensus on good quality management practices. It consists of standards and guidelines related to quality management systems and related supporting standards.

ISO 9001:2000 is the standard that provides a set of standardized requirements for a quality management system, regardless of what the user organization does, its size, or whether it is in the private, or public sector. It is the only standard in the family against which organizations can be certified – although certification is not a compulsory requirement of the standard.

The other standards in the family cover specific aspects such as fundamentals and vocabulary, performance improvements, documentation, training, and financial and economic aspects. Implementing a Quality Management System within an organisation needs to be a decision of top management. The objective of the quality system needs to be clearly defined so that the system can be effective. The design and implementation of quality management system will vary depending on the type, size and products of the organisation and should be used in conjunction with the ISO 9000:2000 standards. Implementing a Quality Management System is not that difficult as it seems, the key is planning and commitment. How complex or simple the QMS is depends entirely on the organisation and what the objectives are. It can be a simple guide to the organisation policy and procedures, or it can document every task and procedure. It really depends on how much risk is involved and how much control is required.

The documentation of QMS involves:

1. The policy to refer to quality, the objectives of quality and the book of quality (Quality Management System)

2. Management Responsibility

3. Resource Management

4. Product Realisation

5. Measurements, Analysis and Improvement

A well managed quality system will have impact on:

1. customer loyalty and repeat business

2. market share

3. operational efficiencies

4. flexibility and ability to respond to market opportunities

5. effective and efficient use of resources

6. cost reductions

7. competitive advantages

Some of the new blogs on ISO 9001 Standards & ISO 14001 standards was found as below:

http://iso14000standards.blogspot.com/

http://iso-9001-standards.blogspot.com/

http://iso14001environmentmanagementsystem.blogspot.com/

http://iso9001qualitymanagementsystem.blogspot.com/

http://iso9001qualitymanual.blogspot.com/

http://iso9000standards.blogspot.com/

http://iso9001-standards.blogspot.com/

http://iso14001standards.blogspot.com/

ISO 9001 Standards – Management Review

Review the quality management system at planned intervals to:- Assess possible opportunities for improvementEnsure a suitable, adequate, and effective system

- Evaluate the need for any changes to the system

- Consider the need for changes to the quality policy and objectives

Maintain records of the management reviews.

Inputs for management review must include information on:

- Results of audits

- Customer feedback

- Process performance and product conformity

- Status of preventive and corrective actions

- Follow-up actions from earlier reviews

- Changes that could affect the quality system

- Recommendations for improvement

Outputs from the management review must include any decisions and actions related to:

- Improvement of the effectiveness of the quality management system and its processes

- Improvement of product related to customer requirements

- Resource needs